To whom our educational systems are developed

Educational systems depend on knowledge and will of it's founders.A proper fair educational system to be found is tough.When people think about money there is no sourse of money except fees of students.So money directly depend on number of students.And students as they are students themself can not decide the quality of education.Also campus interviews depend on relationships between colleges and industries.Industries have much less research works and they appoint these students as labours where they have to practice on a particular range of jobs.
I do not know much more about other educational systems in world.But as much I know educational systems depends on will to learn the content, and applicability and demand of content .As much cutting age technology is in demanding by people more fair educational systems are developed only in that area.
In india where basic needs of food dominate all other necessites,there is much less efforts to go in that technology area.And educational system developers do not relate it to needs,and now it is a simple business making money by collecting students.And it is difficult to make a fair educational system.
Microsoft,cisco like certification systems did not get success to make a proper system.So if information technology management is not successful here,then which technology or approach should be adopted to make a proper system.

I think there is a thing like "fail" in education system that should not exist.After all when all are  in the process of making money with students then student becomes "fail" with respect to whom?There is no need to decleare "fail".It should be sololy depend on student how much he want to learn.

People or recrutiers from industry who emphhasis on a line between pass and fail,do not contain ablity to find out correct person for their business!They want as they buy products from market,they can buy students also.They have only money.And educational systems must not developed for these kind of people.

Union Budget-2010-11-Trying to define common man of india.

New union budget of 2010-11 has been presented.According to expections it defines common man of india is one who lives in tightly bounded life conditions. Drugs,redimade garments,farming machinary,water purifiers became cheap. Media shows that this is not for common man,they show that common man go to buy gold,cars ,A.C.,etc. I can not understand what happened to media?They can not even define common man of india!!


One can get union budget from #http://indiabudget.nic.in/ub2010-11/ubmain.htm

Do not vote to any millionare-A basic fundamental of Democracy

Democracy is a system in which a person selected,works for developments for itself and those who selected him.

If a poor is selected from poors then he will understand and work for poors and himself.

If poors selected a millionare,then question arises-

1.How thay can choose a person whom they do not know.

2.How they can choose a person with whom they can not meet and talk.

3.So how a millionare can be selected according to fundamentals of democracy.



If any way any millionare is selected-

1.How he understand the problems of the persons,to which he do not belong.As any system like democracy is made to make

strong economic base for all.

And a millionare can not understand the problems of poors.

2.Why a millionare will work for poors,as he do not belong to their class.



A millionare must be a side when choosing a candidate for election,as he is achieved the fruits of democracy.

A democracy is a system as other systems and work accordingly.A poor can achieve all fruits like education,earning etc.

from the system itself and there is no need of millionare to guide him.

This is an automatic system.